G4 – Global History: Themes and Approaches
G4 – Global History: Themes and Approaches
Coordination: José Eduardo Franco, José Sales
The current of “global history” as a historiographical ideology proposes that the construction of knowledge about the past should be carried out in the light of a global hermeneutic key, seeking to overcome the tendentially closed or self-referential circular logic of national histories. It is a question of situating the understanding of the themes and problems that are the subject of historiographical research and interpretation within the porous framework of global dynamics, which give greater complexity to the analysis of processes and results, and of taking into account the notion of networks, appropriation and metamorphosis.
Developing research projects from this wide angle, taking historical movements in the long term as a point of critical observation, combined with an analysis of their effects in the medium and short term in a given territory of expression, allows us to understand the objects of historical study in their various genres, with hybrid and composite originalities, in which the local receives from the global and the global is also enriched by the local. History, in essence, comes to be understood in a “glocal” way, in which territories and historical times are studied in their intrinsic connection to the world’s circulating “machine”. The work of global history is built on an epistemological basis that is intrinsically interdisciplinary, inter-epochal, inter-spatial and inter-relational. In the light of this idea, the fundamental purpose of this Research Group is to open up new avenues to explore a multitude of analyses that will make it possible to complexify critically constructed historical knowledge, involving researchers from the various scientific areas that comprise the CEG groups to develop “Global Histories” projects in the most diverse fields of knowledge construction, establishing an articulated relationship with the different research groups and contributing to the construction of their epistemological identity.
Group:
Researchers
Adelino Cardoso
Alícia Duhá Lose
Américo Pereira
Ana Araújo Rafael
Ana Carolina de Carvalho Viotti
Ana Catarina Necho
Andrea Gomes Bedin
Andreia Lopes Fidalgo
António Brehm
António Guimarães Pinto
António M. Saez Romero
Armando Quintas
Assis Daniel Gomes
Carlos Filipe
Carlos Fiolhais
Cristiana Lucas Silva
Cybelle Salvador Miranda
Daniel Brito Rebelo de Sousa Pires
Duarte Valadas Roxo Juzarte Rolo
Edgard Leite Neto
Eliane Cristina Deckmann Fleck
Eurico Dias
Fernando Correia
Francisco José García Fernández
Gabriela Nascimento
Glória Marina Sousa Almeida Évora
Isabel Paulina Sardinha de Gouveia
Joana Filipa da Silva Santos
João Carlos Louçã
João Diogo Loureiro
João Luís Cardoso
João Paulo de Areosa
Jorge Bastos da Silva
Jorge Mangorrinha Martins
José António Falcão
José das Candeias Montes Sales
José Eduardo Franco
José Manuel Brissos-Lino
José Ramón Herrera Delgado
Josineide Siqueira de Santana
Lina Maria Marques Soares
Luís Carlos Pereira Esteves
Luiz Eduardo Meneses de Oliveira
Madalena da Costa Lima
Margarida da Conceição Espiguinha
Maria Augusta Tavares
Maria da Conceição Camps
Maria João Duarte
Maria Manuela Brito Martins
Maria Rosário Bastos
Marta Covita
Milene Loirinho Gonçalves Alves
Natalia Casagrande Salvador
Paula Cristina Ferreira da Costa Carreira
Paulo Alexandre Esteves Borges
Paulo César Drumond Braga
Pedro Albuquerque
Rafael Marques Barbosa Magalhães
Raquel Varela
Renato Epifânio
Ricardo Nuno de Jesus Ventura
Ricardo Pessa de Oliveira
Samuel Fernando Rodrigues Dimas
Silvio Luiz Cordeiro
Sílvio Tamaso D’Onofrio
Susana Mota
Virgínia de Almeida Bessa
Yara Felicidade de Souza Reis