G4 – Global History: Themes and Approaches
G4 – Global History: Themes and Approaches
Coordination: José Eduardo Franco, José Sales
The current of “global history” as a historiographical ideology proposes that the construction of knowledge about the past should be carried out in the light of a global hermeneutic key, seeking to overcome the tendentially closed or self-referential circular logic of national histories. It is a question of situating the understanding of the themes and problems that are the subject of historiographical research and interpretation within the porous framework of global dynamics, which give greater complexity to the analysis of processes and results, and of taking into account the notion of networks, appropriation and metamorphosis.
Developing research projects from this wide angle, taking historical movements in the long term as a point of critical observation, combined with an analysis of their effects in the medium and short term in a given territory of expression, allows us to understand the objects of historical study in their various genres, with hybrid and composite originalities, in which the local receives from the global and the global is also enriched by the local. History, in essence, comes to be understood in a “glocal” way, in which territories and historical times are studied in their intrinsic connection to the world’s circulating “machine”. The work of global history is built on an epistemological basis that is intrinsically interdisciplinary, inter-epochal, inter-spatial and inter-relational. In the light of this idea, the fundamental purpose of this Research Group is to open up new avenues to explore a multitude of analyses that will make it possible to complexify critically constructed historical knowledge, involving researchers from the various scientific areas that comprise the CEG groups to develop “Global Histories” projects in the most diverse fields of knowledge construction, establishing an articulated relationship with the different research groups and contributing to the construction of their epistemological identity.
Group:
Researchers
- Adelino Cardoso
- Alícia Duhá Lose
- Américo Pereira
- Ana Araújo Rafael
- Ana Carolina de Carvalho Viotti
- Ana Catarina Necho
- Andrea Gomes Bedin
- Andreia Lopes Fidalgo
- António Brehm
- António Guimarães Pinto
- António M. Saez Romero
- Armando Quintas
- Assis Daniel Gomes
- Carlos Filipe
- Carlos Fiolhais
- Cristiana Lucas Silva
- Cybelle Salvador Miranda
- Daniel Brito Rebelo de Sousa Pires
- Duarte Valadas Roxo Juzarte Rolo
- Edgard Leite Neto
- Eliane Cristina Deckmann Fleck
- Eurico Dias
- Fernando Correia
- Francisco José García Fernández
- Gabriela Nascimento
- Glória Marina Sousa Almeida Évora
- Isabel Paulina Sardinha de Gouveia
- Joana Filipa da Silva Santos
- João Carlos Louçã
- João Diogo Loureiro
- João Luís Cardoso
- João Paulo de Areosa
- Jorge Bastos da Silva
- Jorge Mangorrinha Martins
- José António Falcão
- José das Candeias Montes Sales
- José Eduardo Franco
- José Manuel Brissos-Lino
- José Ramón Herrera Delgado
- Josineide Siqueira de Santana
- Lina Maria Marques Soares
- Luís Carlos Pereira Esteves
- Luiz Eduardo Meneses de Oliveira
- Madalena da Costa Lima
- Margarida da Conceição Espiguinha
- Maria Augusta Tavares
- Maria da Conceição Camps
- Maria João Duarte
- Maria Manuela Brito Martins
- Maria Rosário Bastos
- Marta Covita
- Milene Loirinho Gonçalves Alves
- Natalia Casagrande Salvador
- Paula Cristina Ferreira da Costa Carreira
- Paulo Alexandre Esteves Borges
- Paulo César Drumond Braga
- Pedro Albuquerque
- Rafael Marques Barbosa Magalhães
- Raquel Varela
- Renato Epifânio
- Ricardo Nuno de Jesus Ventura
- Ricardo Pessa de Oliveira
- Samuel Fernando Rodrigues Dimas
- Silvio Luiz Cordeiro
- Sílvio Tamaso D’Onofrio
- Susana Mota
- Virgínia de Almeida Bessa
- Yara Felicidade de Souza Reis